Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Culture and Media

What was once a society that valued character and actions over all else (pre-1970’s US) has since been transformed into a consumeristic society which values material possessions to create the image of wealth through branding. It’s evident that every species has always been competitive in one way or another but the human race has shifted its competition to attempting to establish who is the wealthiest, according to Juliet Schor the current cultural structure in the US allows an individual to display wealth without actually being wealthy.
      
       Schor argues that the acquisition of high cost materials items such as cars, cloths, and houses is the result of modern day consumerism through the establishment of a brand most likely due to mass media appearance. As a modern day college student I observe this ideology on a daily basis but I like to consider myself an exception to it. Growing up in a household that has always struggled with money has drifted me away from all of these priority materials, however I do occasionally follow the cultural script and put on my only expensive clothes for select events (i.e. Dates, Graduations, Weddings, Interviews). While I normally don’t mind consumerism, I do observe it quite often in the younger generations. Since adolescents are still developing their sense of self they often mimic what they observe with almost no subtlety, for example kids always want the newest game system, the most high end bicycles, the coolest clothes, and if they don’t acquire these items or acquire generic brands they are often ridiculed by other kids.

This interaction between adolescents is a good example of competitive consumption which essentially is the need to have the best of all material items to establish one’s self above all others even if it is a false depiction. Another good example of competitive consumption is the constant feud between my friends regarding their cars. They all have very similar vehicles but are always trying to have the best one in the group by installing expensive upgrades such as lift kits, satellite radios, LED light bars, and custom exhausts. In many ways this is a reflection of the shift within the American Dream which has been inflated from its original concept. In the early 20th century the American Dream was to own a house, have a steady job, and get paid enough to live comfortably without any struggle however now it seems that everyone in the US wants to be the next Bill Gates. This shows in a monumental way in my hometown, comfortable family homes that were built in the 70’s and 80’s are being ripped down all across town and being replaced by mansions and mini mansions to the extent where my 3 bedroom split level home housing 4 people and a dog is now considered a cramped space. Like Schor explained in the video this is happening all over the US, the average square footage per person has increased despite the recent concerns about global population growth and consumption of resources. At first glance you would think that because these large, expensive homes are being built that means that the average salary must have risen significantly over the last 40 years which it has. However, when you consider inflation and the rise of the average cost of living it about evens out to what it was 40 years ago.


The cause of the upscaling of the American Dream may a result of upscale emulation, which Schor describes as the process in which people with comparatively smaller incomes mimic the consumption practices of the "rich and famous" class. I believe that upscale emulation is a fabrication of the media. Each day we encounter advertisements, stories, and subliminal messages in all forms of media which glamorize the lifestyles of celebrities who endorse and use these high end items. In the eyes of the producers (celebrities, companies, and media) this is a three way win. Celebrities are paid large sums to endorse a product, which companies use and place in the media for a fee, and in turn creates an image of superiority, viewers then desire this product more and buy it over cheaper products which drives up the price and moves more product. In the end of it all everyone gets paid except for the consumers. 

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Data As Evidence
Many people believe that their lives are shaped by the individual and by the decisions that they make over time, however many sociologists have researched this topic and have developed the theory that people are the products of their environments. Last night I decided to explore this idea by picking three of the forty largest counties in Illinois to research some of their demographics. First I chose the three counties based on their median family incomes, and I wanted to see large difference in social data so I chose the county with the highest (DuPage-$98,000), with the lowest (Jefferson-$54,000), and a happy median (Grundy-$78,000). I questioned what may have caused these variations in income so I turned to education looking the ratio of the populations that had achieved a college degree. The results were rather linear with the income data, DuPage County once again achieved the highest (49.6%), Jefferson with one of the lowest (16.9%), and Grundy sits in the middle again (26.9%). This data correlation of DuPage having the best statics and Jefferson having the worst ran all through a number of areas such as Teen Births, Child Abuse, and Child Poverty. I then thought that this might have to do with a difference in ethnic populations being the driving force, but in fact all three counties have almost identical data on race with white being the largest (60%-80%) and black being the lowest (about 10%).  So I then turned to geographic locations and I found that DuPage was actually the closest county to Chicago without actually being in Chicago, Grundy was nearby but not as close to Chicago, and Jefferson is actually all the way down by Kentucky.

                After reviewing all of the data the only thing that I could hypothesis from it was that all of these statistics were caused by the geographic location of the counties through the communitive property. Since Chicago is one of the largest and most economically active areas in both the US and world, some of best jobs are within the city. People come from all over to work in Chicago, most of whom are highly educated and work high paying corporate jobs. Since people tend to shape a community these areas have great resources and programs that assist with the average problems a family/community may be facing.

                This correlation of data and its analysis may be able to change the effects of this geographical differences. More troubled counties can look at this data for answers on how to better their communities by modeling their programs and resources available after those closer to the city. This data could also serve as an instigator for families who want to break the “cycle of poverty” and move to these areas to provide better lives for future generations.
                While the data appears to support my hypothesis, geographic location in relation to the city may not be the main cause for the variation in these counties. Often times people with more privileged backgrounds tend to live in privileged areas and vice versa, so the variations may be caused by a “cycle of poverty” or even a “cycle of wealth” which shape this counties. I believe that the best way to further explore this correlation is by case studies of those who have had their families in a single area for multiple generations, and those who have moved between communities. The results of these case studies will help determine if lives truly are products of environment or if they are bounded by the cycle of poverty.

Sources


Monday, September 7, 2015

Sociological Imagination
When looking back at my neighborhoods I like to believe that I experienced two very opposite ends of the spectrum when relating to the neighborhoods of Chicago, Illinois. For the first five years of my life my parents, little brother, and I lived in a small lower class neighborhood in the northwest side of Chicago called Villa Park. We lived right next to the train tracks and from what I remember our neighbors were all good people, mostly blue collar white with a rising presence of Mexican-American immigrants and African-Americans. From what my parents have told me the once peaceful area became a little more restless after my brother and I were born with the occasional acts of arson, domestic violence, and muggings but it was never a dangerous neighborhood. At no point did I ever feel like I was in danger, in an area like that our neighbors were treated like family who would give you the shirt off their backs. As a kid I felt safe and at home but my parents believed we would have a better upbringing elsewhere so right before I started kindergarten we moved to Naperville, IL. Naperville is an upper middle class town considered to be a Southwest suburb of Chicago that was almost entirely college educated white and Asian families. We moved there because it had the best public school system in Illinois, its two high schools were even recently voted into the top 100 public schools in the country. This area was high class and they knew it, last year they were voted the third snobbiest town in the US. The difference between my old neighborhood and this one was like black and white. The first few years there were tough since my family were kind of the outsiders, neither of my parents went to college, both my brother and my mother had disabilities, and we lived in a small split level only a block from brand new million dollar mansions. When reflecting back I believe that I developed my values and attitude when I was back in Villa Park. Everyone there were blue collar so they would work their ass off to provide for the families and then they would come home and still find the energy to play with the kids and socialize with neighbors. However, Naperville had its fair share of wealthy families with humble beginnings such as my neighbors to the left and right. To the left was George, the Pastor/Engineer who first encouraged me to pursue a career in engineering. To the right was Bill who, along with my Dad, got me interested in the outdoors by introducing me to scouting, he even was my mentor when I was applying for my Eagle Scout. Like Bill and George Naperville offered a lot of opportunities and role models that Villa Park just couldn’t afford. Even though it was snobby and rich, and even though I was a bit of the black sheep I still learned a lot about how to succeed in life. I like to believe that my upbringing provided me with a rare view on life, a perspective from both sides of the tracks which in combination will lead me down a path towards a bright future.