To follow the requests of
Dalton Conley, I used the racial dot map program to view the racial locations
within my hometown neighborhood, along with the racial locations of the greater
area. What I found was very interesting, my specific neighborhood was found to
be entirely white with the occasional sprinkle of Asian. This discovering was
not surprising seeing that according to the US Census, my hometown is contains
a population of approximately 80% white, 15% Asian, and only 5% other. As a
result of this race distribution the majority of all areas in the town are
white with small Asian communities around the outskirts of town. However, just beyond
the border of my hometown is a large community of almost entirely Hispanic
people. As a result I believe that my neighborhoods homogeneous demographics is
directly related to the entire town’s racial segregation due to the economic
status of the town as a whole. As I established in a former post, my hometown as
one of the highest mean household incomes in the whole state of Illinois. This means
that the high income level has created a upper class society with higher taxes,
more expensive houses, and better schools which other minorities cannot afford
when observing the mean household incomes of African American and
Hispanic/Latino families which are on average lower than that of white suburban
families. This would explain the segregation of the large population of
Hispanic/Latinos in the nearby town which has a much lower mean household
income. In my experience living in this area, the data is very consistent with my
observations, for example the majority of my high school was rich white kids
with the majority of the African American and Hispanic/Latino students being
bused into the area from Chicago as a part of the No Child Left Behind program.
As a whole I believe that this is an example of how segregated neighborhoods
negate the idea of a socially just world. Sociologists often mention the cycle
of poverty, and I believe that my area is an example of this theory as the opposite
or cycle of wealth. Because my area was so wealthy, and predominantly white, we
received the best resources such as one of the best public and private
education systems in the country, lots of real world job connections, and the
ability to never work until we graduate because of our parent’s wealth. Then
this upbringing allows us to get high paying jobs to live in expensive
neighborhoods that, once again, exclude the lower class. Today unsegregated
neighborhoods are almost far-fetched ideas because of area like mine which are
designed to resist gentrification.
This blog is written by Jon Quinn, a second year mechanical engineering student at Michigan Tech. The main purpose of this is to reflect on the issues discussed in Intro to Sociology class.
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Monday, November 9, 2015
Gender Benders
As
a predominately gender separate society, we tend to notice when something is
out of place. If a girls too tall, or doesn’t wear makeup or dresses she’s mannish.
And if a guy is not big, athletic, hairy, and masculine he’s a “fag” or girly.
So we decided to test the boundaries by taking it way too far. Typically when
someone decides to take a stroll down to their local superstore they encounter
some typically average people, men in jeans and boots with maybe a
hoodie/jacket, and girls in some sort of tight pants/skirt and a pretty blouse
also possibly carrying some sort of warm outerwear. As a group we definitely noticed
these trends of clothing between guys and girls not only among those we
observed but also within our own perceptions of how a person should dress. So
in turn, as our gender norm experiment we took two rather masculine guys from
our group and sent them shopping at Walmart, but with a catch. Each of them
were wearing nearly a complete ensemble of a stereotypical college girl. Both
of them entered Walmart at the same time, one wearing a very short dress and
the other wear a short dress with a sweater to cover those scandalous shoulder
straps. The gender norm violators then simply walked around to do their daily
shopping while the rest of examined their behavior, as well as the behavior of
the pedestrians, from afar.
We
interviewed the gender norm violators before and after conducting the experiment,
the initial responses were concurrent with both subjects, that they were
nervous and felt awkward even wearing such formfitting clothes out in public. This
was an interesting response because in relation to what a girl can wear out in
public, these outfits were rather conservative. Also, guys typically walk
around shirtless when it gets hot enough. After the test was conducted, the
boys seemed a lot more lighthearted by saying that their performance in the
store was funny that they are glad that was over. They did mention that they
felt like the center of attention while walking through the store, as if they
could feel when people were looking at them.
From
a safe distance the rest of us observed the effects that these young men
dressed in woman’s clothing had on other pedestrians. Surprisingly there no
dramatic reactions, the most confrontational reaction that anyone had towards
the boys is when another man jokingly commented towards them “looking good
ladies”. Other than that the violators did not receive a lot of
acknowledgement, people would just pass by and maybe have a second take once
they were passed and kid sometimes pointed at the strange sight. From what we
could observe there was really no impact on the pedestrians, most of them acted
like either they didn’t really care or that it was rather funny.
In
the eyes of any member of the general public this experiment might have been
viewed as a failure, looking at the fact that we never received any dramatic
effect on the pedestrians, but I believe we did yield some very important
information from the violators. The violators stated that they were
uncomfortable with the whole situation ever since the conception of this experiment
and that they felt like they stuck out when walking through the store. This is
important because we can only assume that this is how a cross dresser or trans
person must feel as they live every day like that, as an outcast. The results
of this test showed us that while society believes that we are ready to accept
all kinds, we still unintentionally cast out these individuals because of our
idea of gender boundaries with clothes that have been subliminally programmed into
our brains since we were babies. While we have come a long way since the days
when we would publically humiliate those who are different, we still have a
long way to go before we can say society is truly accepting of gender boundary violators.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)